Bouma water falls, Taveuni.
Posted by Picasa

Big Fish Eat Little Fish.

Vakaivosavosa has another view of N.L.T.B and their incursion into the cellular network industry.
Apparently the Fijian segment of the blogosphere are slowly jumping on to that story lead. Here is an excerpt from Fiji T.V revealing the names of the ursurping board of Ba Holdings Ltd.

New board for Ba Provincial Holdings Ltd
1 Aug 2006 17:57:15
More details today on what transpired at the special meeting of Ba Provincial Holdings Limited yesterday.

A new board has been appointed - they will review the operations of the company and report to the council in three months time.

The new board is made up of TAUKEI SAWAIEKE - RATU TEVITA MOMOEDONU as chairman the TAUKEI VIDILO - RATU VILIAME BOUWALU, ERONI LEWAQAI, SAIMONI NAIVALU, PONIPATE LESAVUA, JOSAIA DRISO, RATU TEVITA LEWARAVU, MESAKE SAUKAWA, ASESELA SADOLE and SIVA NAULAGO.

These individuals named have little to no experience in running any business let alone a company with stakes in media operations. The new chairman was recently appointed to the board of N.L.T.B and another individual on the new board is also a member of the Great Council of Chiefs. The marriage of convenience between corporate affairs and tribal affairs is also a realization that the honey moon is over. Furthermore it highlights the dangers of cross-contamination of tribal commerce and national interests that may be have violated ethical considerations in Fiji.

Apparently there is some discrepancy in the manner in which the shareholders meeting was convened, violating the standing rules of the company.
Technically, the company secretary was supposed to inform the old board of a extraordinary meeting. Instead, a shareholder's meeting was held without the 30 day notification. It was at this meeting where the decision was made to remove the existing board and replace it with another entity. Although shareholders have a say in the company direction, they cannot legally defy existing grounds rules of the 1983 legislation also known as the Companies Act (Chapter 247). Here is an academic paper on financial reporting based on that Companies Act.
It will be interesting to see how this unfolds in court.

Sir Vijay Singh, a former barrister and Fiji Attorney General emeritus is launching a book titled "Speaking Out".

Nationalists want new book banned
8 Aug 2006 18:06:03

The Fiji Nationalist Party says it will lobby for government to stop the launch of a book written by former politician Sir Vijay R Singh. The book, SPEAKING OUT contains Sir Vijay's thoughts on Fiji in the decade 1995 to 2005.

Nationalist party president Saula Telawa says excerpts of the book are in-sensitive to Christians and the principles they believe in.

Even before it's hit the book-shops. Sir Vijay R Singh's new book has attracted attention for the wrong reason.

This is a glimpse of the book cover, courtesy of an invitation sent by the University of the South Pacific last week.

In an excerpt printed on the flip side of the invitation, Sir Vijay writes.

The marches claimed to express their extreme disapproval that the Prime Minister is an Indo-Fijian one may well ask how they reconcile their repugnant racist sentiment on the weekday with their purported devotion to the biblical precept of the brotherhood of man on Sunday.

The marches claimed to express their extreme disapproval that the Prime Minister is an Indo-Fijian one may well ask how they reconcile their repugnant racist sentiment on the weekday with their purported devotion to the biblical precept of the brotherhood of man on Sunday.
Today the nationalist party has taken exception to this.

Saula Telawa along with his fellow nationalists took the streets in 2000 to campaign against the Fiji Labor Leader and the than Prime Minister Mahendra Chaudhry,

(Translation: It can't happen.Thee bible says just leave them, separate yourselves from them)

Telawa says he will raise his concerns with the Prime Minister Laisenia Qarase and possibly the Methodist Church. He says Sir Vijay's thoughts are in-sensitive to Christian beliefs and the vanua.

Speaking Out is scheduled to be launched at USP next Wednesday.

It is rather disappointing to hear about these so-called nationalists trying to lobby policies that belong in the dark ages and disguising it as offensive to the vanua.

S.i.F.M queries whether the book is as offensive as Native Lands Trust Board's abuse of landowners, or the recent High Court judgment by Justice John O'Connor( in the FSC tramline case) that the native land does not belong to the indigenous population but the aspects of command and control rests solely with Native Lands Trust Board.

Here is the excerpt of the Fiji Times article.

Not your land, it's NLTB's, says court
Thursday, August 03, 2006

The court has given the Native Land Trust Board and the Fiji Sugar Corporation two days to resolve the dispute.
The High Court has told landowners they have no right to block a railway line because the land concerned is legally vested under the Native Land Trust Board.

High Court judge Justice John Connors gave the Fiji Sugar Corporation and the Native Land Trust Board two days to resolve the land dispute.

Justice Connors told the villagers they must not take the law into their own hands and warned that there might be serious repercussions if their actions were repeated.

Justice Connors told members of the Mataqali Masokanalagi that they had no proper rights under the NLTB Act to make demands for premiums and payment.

"There's nothing under the Act that gives them that right," he said. He told them the NLTB was the body that had powers to make such demands. The NLTB, FSC and landowners were defendants in a case filed by the Sugar Cane Growers Council.

The two landowners who appeared in court yesterday gave an assurance that the blockade had been removed. Samuela Naisau told the court that they respected its injunction and removed the blockade.

The members of the mataqali sealed off a railway track leading to Rarawai Mill three weeks ago, leaving thousands of farmers in parts of Ba and Tavua with no option but to transport their crop by lorries.

The dispute was over non-renewal of leases for land the railway runs through. Justice Connors told the lawyers of the three parties NLTB, FSC and the landowners that they must report to court on Friday.

He gave NLTB and FSC two days to discuss issues relating to Sorokoba, hoping to put pressure on them to resolve the matter.

He said in that way, a speedier resolution might have been arrived at.

The landowners were represented by Lautoka lawyer Mosese Naivalu. Corporation lawyer Faizal Hanif said the two parties had been meeting all of yesterday and were progressing well in their discussions.

But he said they were yet to reach common ground. Board lawyer Kemueli Qoro said the two parties were making every effort for the lease to be renewed.

Council chief executive Jagannath Sami said the council took legal action as a final bid to bring together all the parties involved in the dispute. Council lawyer Shalen Krishna said in court that he hoped the judge's call for an early review into the matter would solve the whole issue.

The board was represented by Kemueli Qoro and Mr Naivalu represented the landowners.

It is time to paint these nationalists for what they truly are: Fly-by-night political opportunists who try to label the author's work as insensitive whilst neglecting their own tardiness. The comments by these pseudo-Christian nationalists, demonstrate how matters in Fiji can easily be slanted, skewed to the benefit of the elite minority.

S.i.F.M has seven words for these scoundrels of the lowest order:

"We're not going to sit in silence!"

It would have been more constructive to have these nationalists explore the reason why Fijians have not ventured in the book publishing industry, or why there has never been any significant proposals in translating self-help books into the Fijian vernacular. Maybe an ignorant populace is exactly what these nationalist want in Fiji.

Roberts Rules of Order should be among the first books that need translation to elevate that knowledge among the common threads of Fiji.

These provocateurs talk a lot and have little to show for. More so in literature excellence and should be the last people in Fiji to be consulted.


Club Em Designs


Related Tags: Fiji blog, Fiji, Fiji politics, Native Lands Trust Board, Socio-cultural, Socio-political, Analysis of politics

Fiji Times denies Gate keeping role.

Fiji Times Editor, Samisoni Kaikaivalu is under fire for filtering out letters to the editor that are critical of the Fiji media industry. This allegations stems from former journalists who submitted letters concerning the recent Fiji media awards, alluding to the fact that, print media journalists have been glossed over repeatedly for the award. The entry criteria for the awards is available on PDF.

Gatekeeping of media stories in Fiji have been documented. A similar circumstance was the military truth campaign prior to the 2006 elections. Including the feeble attempt by Fiji Times to paint the commander as a villain for speaking out against the Fiji Government.

A report by Morris W. Shanahan on the abilities of radio journalism during the 2000 coup and highlights the complexities of Fiji.



read more | digg story

Strange Bedfellows of Fiji.

The recent attempt by sacked C.E.O, Isimeli Bose to seize control of the affairs of the provincial company raise more questions than answers to the whole affair. Recent letters to the Fiji Times editor led to another dimension to the story of the issuance of licenses, to operate a cellular network in Fiji.

Ba provincial council's commercial arm was successful in creating a satellite television provider whose main rival was Fiji Television subsidiary Sky TV. Ba provincial also entered into partnership with Caribbean mobile carrier Digicel; who are also major sponsors of Fiji 7's brand.
Digicel's sponsorship of Fiji Rugby places the chairman Keni Dakuidreketi in a tight spot(especially in wake of the Australia A massacre of the Fiji XV), of declaring his interest. Fiji Island Business online magazine outlines in two articles, the extent of the dealings involving those eyeing the cellular network licenses.

Native Lands Trust Board(N.L.T.B) appointed Messr Dakuidreketi as a proxy entity lobbying proposals for N.L.T.B's commercial arm: Vanua development Corporation who established a third competitor to the cell phone market.
Dakuidreketi also represents certain hotel developers involved with Natadola project, further staining his integrity as a honest broker. A symposium for Land Tenure conflicts held at University of the South Pacific between 10-12th April 2002, published a list of attendees. Among them were high profile N.L.T.B officials and Dakuidreketi. That particular knowledge gaining exercise, undeniably will face the acid test with outraged native land owners who will not shy away from legal avenues.

Legal Challenge to Natadola Hotel Development
Fiji T.V 7 Aug 2006 16:51:24
The multi-million dollar resort development at Natadola has hit a snag with a court order stopping development on part of the property.

Mataqali Waikelia is alledging the Native Land Trust Board and a developer, Hotel Property Pacific Limited colluded to acquire a lease on a piece of land where a golf course designed by Vijay Singh is being built.

Court documents were obtained by Fiji One News today. They were filed in the Lautoka High Court on June 16th by lawyers representing Mataqali Waikelia.

This mataqali claims to own approximately 69 and half acres of land at Natadola where the resort development is taking place.

According to an affidavit filed by mataqali member Bati Qaniuci, members of the mataqali Waikelia currently reside on land which has been cleared by machinery by employees of Natadola Land Holdings Limited.

The mataqali claims the issuance of lease by NLTB is in blatant disregard to the rights and previledge of the mataqali, its members and the provisions of the Native Land Trust act.

With development work already underway, the mataqali claim in the affidivit they had a meeting with Keni Dakuidreketi of Hotel Property Pacific Limited on May 14th.

Bati Qaniuci gave sworn evidence that Dakuidreketi, also a board member of the NLTB asked the mataqali members to raise their queries with the NLTB.

The mataqali claims the NLTB and the 2nd defendents acted in collusion to deprive them and it's members the use and occupation of Waikelia and Naliku land.

Lautoka High court judge Justice Finnigan has issued a stop work order on the piece of land in dispute and also restrained the NLTB from processing or registering the lease on the disputed piece of land.

The matter is listed to be brought before the High Court on June 30th. And telephone messages left with the developers representatives weren't returned when this bulletin was prepared.

The co-venture between N.L.T.B and millionaire investor Ballu Khan. N.L.T.B also procurred SAP software using a Ballu Khan who charged a handsome sum. The case of State Vs Major Tenders Board, underlined the stakes involved. Other losing bidders for that lucrative software contract have also filed a law suit naming several locals as defendants, including Dakuidreketi.

Digicel's involvement in creating a Fiji entity is ruffling the feathers of those comfortable with the status quo of a monopolized cellular network industry. Vodaphone Fiji's monopoly status was effectively removed by the current Fiji Government, in a bid to open up competition in the market stagnant with inefficiencies.
An academic paper(PDF) by U.S.P lecturers: Spike Bodell and Krishn Shah provides an intellectual foundation on Fiji's most divisive issue: land.



read more | digg story

Bear and Forebear.

Isimeli Bose, the deposed C.E.O of Ba Provincial Holdings directing the assault on the building owned by the province. This action was in retaliation to his forcible removal from the position, in a hostile takeover by a separate faction from the same province.
Posted by Picasa

A Stich in Time.

It is now abundantly clear that, the landonwners and supporters are now being appraised with the real land deals in Fiji. Including other shifty arrangements made in the smoky back rooms that only benefit the cronies involved with Native Lands Trust Board. S.i.F.M commented on that dichotomy in a posting titled :"Conflict of Interests".

S.i.F.M does not condone the actions perpetuted by the antagonists, including Isimeli Bose's assault on the Ba provincial council building named: Rogorogoivuda. Fiji village reports that Isimeli Bose was subsequently charged in court.
This is the excerpt of the article.

Sacked CEO to Appear in Special Court Sitting
By fijivillage
Aug 5, 2006, 13:33

Police have arrested and charged the former chief executive of the Ba Provincial Holdings Limited and he will appear in a special court seating in Lautoka this hour.

Divisional Crime Officer Western SP Vijay Singh confirmed that Isimeli Bose was charged in the last hour and police are still questioning some of his accomplices.

Bose allegedly led a group of armed men storming the Rogo Rogo i Vuda House yesterday and assaulting the security guards.
Meanwhile, a plea today from one of the high chiefs of Ba to his people not to take the law into their own hands.

Ba Provincial Council Chairman Ratu Ovini Bokini said the people of Ba should bear in mind that the province and the shareholders have already made a decision.

Ratu Ovini maintains that the interim board has been appointed and is to be led by Ratu Tevita Momoedonu

Audio Comment

Chairman Ratu Tevita Momoedomu and members of the interim board are being interviewed by police at the Lautoka police station as investigations continue.

Ba Provincial Chairman's comments were neither helpful nor constructuve to the discussion, as his patronizing comments was perceived to be out of touch with the concerns of the grass roots people.

Furthermore the chairman, Ovini Bokini has a tendency to skew his comments more to the established position that protect a brand of archaic wealth distribution in Fiji. In addition, the condescending attitude illustrated by Ba provincial council's chairman, also underlines the panacea in the old arrangement; whose benefits hardly trickle down the the common person.

Here are selected letters to the Fiji Times Editor, which highlight the conundrum.

Land laws

LANDOWNERS are getting the signal of what to expect from the proposed land legislations from your article (FT 2/8) titled Not your land, but NLTB's'.

The proposed Native Land Trust Act takes away the right of bargaining and agreement between the landlord and tenants as enshrined in the Agricultural Landlord and Tenants Act.

The former only recognises the trustee which, in this case, is the Native Land Trust Board.

How can the judge say that it is not our land but NLTB's? I think I have grasped the cache.

Utiko Nabunobuno
Lautoka

Telecom service

SO the mystery unfolds. While we urbanites relentlessly pour out our frustration regarding telecommunication disservice, media reports highlight that politicking and manoeuvring at the highest level are rife in the market share of the mobile telecommunication sector.

And the billion-dollar question is who will represent our best interests as people of Fiji?

The NLTB seems to be in the thick of things, dabbling in business ventures that its original mission did not have scope for.

How is it that with money to spare for investment, the entity which is the guardian of the landowners' best interests continues to push one agenda while landowners continue to highlight in the news their land issues?

Do landowners want mobile telecommunication and its costs?

Landline penetration to rural areas is not 100 per cent so who is supposed to benefit from the service?

It is odd that Pacific Connex, an IT-specialist entity is a key stakeholder in this venture. We can only assume that any mobile telecommunications expertise required will be outsourced, thus more costs to us taxpayers at the end of the day.

Then we have the drama at the Ba Provincial Council which seems to point to some influence from Vanua Development Corporation NLTB's investment arm in Pacific Connex.

Is the cold weather causing the season of executive coups in the West in the span of two weeks?

It seems the NLTB is overstepping its boundary by lobbying policies that affect the State's obligation to the people.

With great humility we ask provincial councils to remain steadfast in their vision for what is best for people in urban, rural and international centres as our parallel links remain firm.

Blood must remain thicker than water.

Allow us to raise our disgust at the unfolding of the Animal Farm shenanigans being enacted that only perpetuates the "all animals are equal but some more equal than others" syndrome.

We say open mobile telecommunication to Digicel and VDCL.

Let the consumer's buying power dictate and remain loyal to the entity willing to do the hard slog and go the extra mile for us. Consumers are taxpayers and the fact is that real money remains concentrated in urban and international communities.

We hope good sense and judgment prevail.

Seini Lutu
Suva
Maryann Tagi
Laucala
Ulamila Wragg
Cook Islands
Vasiti Ritova
Ra
Sisilia Lewaravu
Lautoka
Vani Twigg
Turkey
Lanna Lomaloma
Papua New Guinea
Tago Fine'Aloto
Suvavou
Mereoni Bola
United States
Tulia Takala
Lautoka

Club Em Designs

Ba landowners dismantle barriers.

The protest of road blocks by landowners was heard at the Lautoka High Court, subsequently the court ordered the landowners to remove the barricade across tramlines which cart harvested sugarcane to the area's only sugar mill.

Justice Connor's ruling may also require some further analysis because it may impinge on the constitutional guarantees that protect native land. If native landowners are not legally bound to raise issues concerning their ancestral land, then according to Justice Connor the landowner ownership claims, exist basically on paper only. That legal definition will not go down well with the grassroots villagers, who bear witness to this violation of natural jusitice.


read more | digg story

Do Right and Fear No Man!

Kalivati Bakani-Native Lands Trust Board's General Manager.
Posted by Picasa

All compelled readers who wish to contact Messr. Kalivati Bakani and raise their concern about the mismanagement of Native Lands Trust Board and the abuse of landowners can actually do so.

Reach out to K. Bakani directly, using his Fiji based cell phone:
(+679 999-5880).

S.i.F.M encourages all concerned readers to do so, with much vigor.

3G Vodaphone_hiccups.
Posted by Picasa

Better one house spoilt than two.

The announcement of the Qoliqoli Bill by Fiji Government cabinet has received a wide spectrum of reactions. The article raises some reservations, to the naming of the much maligned Native Lands Trust Board (N.L.T.B) to the negotiating table. Clearly, the patience of the indigenous community with the N.L.T.B is wearing thin after the incidents in the western division, involving landowners.

Here is an excerpt from Fiji Times article on the matter.

Cabinet okays Qoliqoli Bill
Thursday, August 03, 2006

TOURISM stakeholders are backing a Cabinet decision to table the Qoliqoli Bill in Parliament despite some reservations.

The decision to introduce the Bill in the Lower House was made following a recommendation by Fijian Affairs Minister, Ratu Naiqama Lalabalavu.

He said the principal objective of the Bill was to transfer to qoliqoli owners from the State the proprietary ownership of their respective qoliqoli areas currently owned by the Government.

Fiji Visitors Bureau chief executive Viliame Gavoka said the Bill was unique to Fiji and, therefore, a major selling point because many tourists wanted benefits to trickle down to landowners. But, he cautioned, that while it was a brilliant idea and experiment to come up with a Bill, a proper management system needed to be put in place.

Fiji Islands Hotel and Tourism Association chief executive Mereani Korovavala said in their discussions with the Attorney-General and other stakeholders, they raised concern on how the Bill may have indirect impact on their operations.

She said the University of the South Pacific was undertaking a study to determine a formula that would be submitted to the Government. This would look at the method and amount to be paid to the State by association members for the lease of land.

She said the association would abide by any decision the Government made in regards to the Bill as any uncertainty would have an adverse impact on tourism. Fiji Resource Owners Association Ratu Osea Gavidi said while they welcomed the Bill, the State should relinquish the land to the vanua or the yavusa and not to the Native Land Trust Board because it was just another arm of government.

"We, as vanua leaders, will decide whether we'll join a body to administer qoliqoli or we'll open a management body to administer it," he said.

Ratu Naiqama said the Bill marked the culmination of 125 years of preparation and expectation by Fijian chiefs and their tribes over their traditional customary rights. He pointed out claims for compensation for past use of qoliqoli areas would not be entertained.

"This is because all land that is to be transferred to the qoliqoli owners is owned by the State, and as such, the qoliqoli owners cannot claim for land that they do not own."

He said a feature of the Bill would be the establishment of a Qoliqoli Commission through the reconstitution of the Native Fisheries Commission.

Ratu Naiqama said no commercial fishing license issued for operation within qoliqoli waters may be issued without consultation with the commission, which may insist on certain conditions. Cabinet has approved the tabling of the Indigenous Claims Tribunal Bill.

The Bill seeks to address the long-standing grievances of landowners who claim part of their land was acquired by early settlers through fraudulent or dubious means.

Club Em Designs

Fiji Young Leaders Association members with Fijian Holdings Ltd. Director, Sitiveni Weileilakeba (Front row-1st from left).
Posted by Picasa

Office of Director of Public Prosecutions-Fiji.

The racket raised by Kevueli Tunidau in the Fiji media recently only attracted attention to the office and the history of the incumbents. Prior to the 2006 elections, an Australian expatriate held the position and was successful in spear heading the 2000 coup investigations. Apparently the success was also a thorn in the side of antagonists.
Here is the excerpt from the article:

Call for the truth on Ridgway

Senior government appointments should be made in a transparent manner and should not go to those who toe the right political line.
Former Soqosoqo ni Vakavulewa ni Taukei party general secretary Ema Druavesi made the comment after the office of the Director of Public Prosecutions suspended Acting DPP Kevueli Tunidau for making public statements against the appointment of an expatriate to take up the job.

“If the Government expelled former Deputy DPP Peter Ridgway, then why is it looking to employ another expatriate?” said Mrs Druavesi.
“Was it because of his successful work in putting to jail some of the well-known names in the community? Who was that junior officer who had given the letter of expulsion to Mr Ridgway? Who has given him the authority to write the letter? The Government should come out clean and explain to the public why it chose to employ another expatriate after they had earmarked Tunidau for the job.”

When Mr Tunidau was sent in as a replacement, she said, it had cost the Government money for him to study overseas. She said the Government should reinstate Mr Tunidau if it was to be true in implementing the blueprint.

The action to remove Peter Rideway also places the spotlight on some members of Fiji Police who have are also tainted with involvement, collusion and corruption with the coup makers of 1987 and 2000.

Here is another article by Micheal Field with Rideway outlining the scope of investigations.

State prosecutor cites Fiji vice-president and key politicians in coup

By Michael Field

SUVA, March 7 2003 - A Fiji state prosecutor in High Court Friday made pointed references to the nation’s vice-president and several leading politicians who he said were involved in the treason behind the May 2000 coup which ended the country’s first Indian led government.

Australian Peter Ridgway was summing up in the treason trial of journalist Jo Nata and politician Timoci Silatolu have been on trial for treason before Australian Justice Andrew Wilson here.

Law enforcement sources outside court told AFP a new set of high profile arrests was imminent.

Now convicted traitor George Speight led a group of special forces soldiers into Parliament on May 19, 2000, seizing then Prime Minister Mahendra Chaudhry and eventually holding him and his government hostage for 58 days. During that time the military declared martial law and later installed a civilian government. Chaudhry never returned to office.

The handful of arrests since then have prompted numerous questions from Chaudhry over what he saw as a cover-up of other more significant people in the coup.

Speaking in court Ridgway named Speight and Silatolu and the current deputy speaker of parliament, Rakuita Vakalalabure, as “these three men acting in a common pursuit“ at the head of the coup.

Vakalalabure, who leads the Conservative Alliance party formed to campaign to get Speight pardoned, has never been charged with any offence. His party provides key coalition support for the Prime Minister Laisenia Qarase’s government.

Ridgway said the day after the coup Nata played a key role in swearing in the illegal government, and Ridgway stressed that this was sworn by an illegally declared president, Josefa Seniloli, who is now vice-president and who has never been charged for his role in the coup.

Ridgway also cited several other key figures, still uncharged, for their roles. These included veteran one-time Foreign Minister Bernardo Vunibobo and the then leader of the opposition, Inoke Kubuabola, who is now Fiji’s High Commissioner to Papua New Guinea.

Vunibobo, he said, had attended meetings after the coup and advised Speight and his group that they should tell the United Nations of the “new regime” in place and that the seat in the world body should go to them.

Documents seized later from Nata’s home showed that Vunibobo was to be the new foreign minister and Kubuabola the telecommunications minister.

Kubuabola worked with Nata to draft the decrees, the court was told.

In court he made no reference to any charges against the men and referred to them instead as “the cohort of losers” as they had all lost seats in parliament in earlier elections and were engaged in trying to remove a democratically elected government.

During the hearing of evidence a defence witness, former special forces solider Salesi Tuifagalele who had immunity from prosecution, caused a sensation by claiming under oath that Speight, before the coup, had told them that the coup had the financial backing of two leading Indian companies, C J Patel and Punjas.

On Friday Ridgway told the five assessors that Tuifagalele’s evidence was not credible, particularly the reference to the companies: “That is the kind of thing Speight would say to convince greedy, ignorant, stupid people to fall into the plot, don’t believe it.”

In court the significance of the naming of various politicians were not explained, however a law enforcement source outside court said it was a “clear warning.

“We are awaiting the outcome of this trial and more arrests will follow.”

The move will not necessarily directly destabilise the Qarase Government but could wreck its coalition partner. It may force the government to call a snap election ahead another date in court, in June when Chaudhry’s Fiji Labour Party goes to the Supreme Court to challenge the legality of the government itself.

A public opinion poll this week showed Qarase retaining support among Fijian voters while the pro-Speight camp was losing support.

Justice Wilson was to have begun summing up by now and it was expected a verdict would come by Tuesday.

However it is not now expected until March 17 at the earliest, and Justice Wilson suppressed from publication the reasons for the delay.

All counsel agreed with the reason.

read more | digg story

Colonial opens their doors in Pacific Harbour, a resort community, located an hours drive from Suva.
Posted by Picasa

Native Fishing Grounds Bill.

Fiji Government cabinet has approved the tabling of a Bill to transfer ownership of native fishing grounds, from the state to the traditional landowning units who have been historically documented as prime users of the resource. Native fishing grounds are known as Qoliqoli in the Fijian vernacular.

read more | digg story

Domestic water supply in Fiji.

The article by Fiji Sun confirms that the down-stream pipe infrastructure has been without maintenance for decades. It also forces the issues to surface of public attention and drawing political heat as well. To place the blame on consumers as done by this task-force, made up of business people only reflects the 'ivory tower' mentality at the top.

read more | digg story

Fiji landowners.

The realization of many landowners of Fiji concerning their non-participation in negotiating phases for the expiral of leases. This incident is a growing trend among landowners who have felt used by their trust administrator, Native Lands Trust Board. This case in Sigatoka mirrors a similar one in Sorokoba where landowners have blocked access.

read more | digg story

Running Free-Catch me if you can.
Posted by Picasa

Modus Operandi-Running Free

The attempt by Fiji P.M to refloat the controversial and reworded Reconciliation, Tolerance and Unity (R.T.U)Bill is another reminder that the ghosts of 2000 have yet to be laid to rest.
Insert-Minister of Vice- Naiqama Lalabalavu(M.P Cakaudrove) and Sam Tikonaisau (M.P Tailevu and brother of George Speight-2000 coup leader) both of whom been involved with the 2000 post-coup events.


It is apparent the S.D.L party, provides political buoyancy to the R.T.U Bill which is bound to create another wedge in Fiji society. S.D.L has some support from some circles of the Fiji media like the political editor of Fiji Sun, Messr Maika Bolatiki.

This is an excerpt of his article.

Push for new-look RTU Bill

By Maika Bolatiki
Political Editor
The Multi-Party Government will table a new look Reconciliation, Tolerance and Unity Bill in the near future. The President, Ratu Josefa Iloilo in his address at the opening of parliament said: "The Promotion of Reconciliation, Tolerance and Unity Bill, introduced last year, will be brought back to Parliament with a largely revised framework for further consideration. It will take full account of the recommendations of the Parliamentary Sector Committee which held wide consultations with the people." The Prime Minister, Mr Laisenia Qarase has confirmed that a new Bill will be submitted to parliament with changes including significant amendments to the Amnesty provisions.

A new round of public hearings is likely, he said at the Joint Session of National Advisory Council for Indian and Minority Communities at the Tradewinds Convention Center last month. This follows the negative comments directed at the Amnesty clause of the proposed Reconciliation, Tolerance and Unity Bill. "We repeatedly emphasized that there would be no general amnesty and that other parts of the Bill were of equal or even greater importance.

These provisions were virtually ignored by the critics." Prime minister Qarase said. The Prime Minister made it clear that they had an open mind about the public debate and attached great importance to the view of the people with changes, improvement and clarification to be made, as necessary. He reiterated that one of the Bill's vital section concerns the appointment of a permanent Reconciliation, Tolerance and Unity Council, with its own legislation.

"It will replace the existing Council for National Reconciliation and Unity, which does not have any special legal foundation or power," he said "The new Council will play an important part in our National effort to bridge divisions between our communities." The Council will adopt a National policy for National Reconciliation and have the authority to take specific initiates for achieving greater multi-cultural understanding The Prime Minister is optimistic that the granting of amnesty to those who were involved would enable them to tell the whole truth about what had transpired.

It is a fact that the nation is still haunted by the ghost of the May 2000 political upheaval. Both the Fiji Labour Party and the National Federation Party are totally against the Bill, but had strongly backed the call by Commissioner of Police Andrew Hughes for a Commission of Inquiry In a statement by FLP leader Mahendra Chaudhry, he said the government should institute a public inquiry to establish the truth of what happened in 2000 and key players behind the terrorist activities.

"The unlawful takeover of parliament, the 56-day hostage crisis and the months of violence and mayhem that followed, wrecked the economy brought untold suffering to thousands of innocent people and led to loss of lives," Mr Chaudhry said."Although some people have been persecuted and convicted for their part of the coup, a lot still needs to be revealed We still don't know who the real instigators were, nor have we tracked down the financiers of the coup."

The same call had also been echoed by Josefa Nata, one of the key players in the political upheaval of May 2000. He is now serving a life sentence at Nukulau. The FLP leader said that the party knew that former coup-convict Maciu Navakasuasua is also prepared to testify before an inquiry. According to Mr Chaudhry the people of Fiji want an inquiry. Government he says must take heed of this. It should stop wasting time and money on the controversial RTU Bill, stop releasing people convicted of coup-related crimes and set up a national inquiry, headed by an eminent jurist, into the events of 2000.

Let us take a look at how amnesty will be granted under this Bill and I'm looking at the Bill that was tabled in parliament last year. First of all I will clarify why amnesty was granted to those involved in the 1987 coup and not to those involved in the 2000 coup. 1987 coup leader and former Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka said the only difference between the two coups was that the 1987 coup leader managed to exercise control of the country and actually ran an effective "government' albeit "defacto". He managed to run the government with the army and police and the Courts, which were sworn- in. As a result, the position of the Queen in Fiji became "untenable" and Her Majesty's representative here, acknowledging that, resigned, effectively heralding in the new system of a republican government headed by a Military - appointed and supported administration which enabled the transition from the "defacto" state to a "dejure" state, allowing the Military to appoint a President of the Republic.

The 2000 attempt failed to take control of anything and could not exercise any authority to eclipse the legitimate authority of the land.
2000 coup leader George Speight and his supporters according to Mr Rabuka took on something they knew nothing about. The military intervened but the alternative was for them to have disregarded the request of the former President not to be asked to return to the Presidency, and for the Army to restore law and order, return Ratu Sir Kamisese to the Presidency and allow him then to negotiate with Mr. Chaudhry on the way forward.

There was no police investigation against Mr Rabuka and the military about the 1987 coup because they became the law. They were granted amnesty and this was included in the 1990 Constitution and also in the 1997 Constitution. However, there is a great difference in the amnesty section of the Unity Bill. In the current legislation, prisoners could be freed under compulsory supervision order (CSO). This is under the discretion of the Commissioner of Prisons, under the Prerogative of Mercy and under the directive of the Minister for Home Affairs.

Let us have a look at why the granting of amnesty in the new Bill is totally different from the amnesty granted to Mr Rabuka and his colleagues. When they were granted amnesty, they did not make any revelation to the public or a committee as to why they carried out the coup. For amnesty to be granted to someone imprisoned for his involvement in the 2000 coup he will have to make an application to the Commission. Upon receiving an application for amnesty, the Commission may - * reject the application if it is trivial, frivolous or vexatious or that it relates to an act which is not connected with a political objective or on the ground that it is an act committed outside the designated period; or * refer the application to the Amnesty Committee to hear the application. For the applicant, he must successfully argue that an act was associated with a political objective and was not purely criminal. If the argument is not accepted, there will be no amnesty. There has to be a full and truthful disclosure under oath of all the relevant facts. If a lie is told, perjury is committed.

Without this full disclosure, there is no amnesty. The country needs to know the truth about the events of 2000. This is government's last bid for reconciliation and unity. Mr Chaudhry is also party to the political upheaval after he had ignored the advice by the police of a possible coup and that no permit for marches should be granted.

The granting of amnesty will persuade the people involved in the coup to come forward and relate the whole truth of what had happened. Mr Chaudhry in supporting the Commission of Inquiry supports the revelation of the whole truth about the May 2000 upheaval. This is what will also be achieved in the RTU Bill when it is enacted. It is a fact that the FLP leader supports the RTU Bill through a Commission of Inquiry. We should be happy that the Prime Minister has confirmed the amnesty section will be amended.

Point of correction, F.L.P leader has never supported the R.T.U Bill. Messr Chaudary has indicated his support for the commission of inquiry. To report that the F.L.P leader is supportive of the R.T.U Bill without stating when or where this comment was made; underlines the obtuse reporting by Fiji Sun's political editor. There is a demarcating line between the two issues. It is disconcerting to see these lines intentionally blurred by the Fiji media, acting on a hidden agenda that is far divorced from the intentions of the people of Fiji.

The article writer contradicts himself- by initially stating that the new R.T.U Bill has withdrawn amnesty provisions. Yet in the last paragraph, "Without this full disclosure, there is no amnesty".
By the writer's own words, the Amnesty provision still exists. Although, there are some conditions like providing truth disclosure of the events they participated in, to a relatively unknown committee.

As far as S.i.F.M is concerned, this watered-down bill is still unacceptable and makes a mockery of the rule of law.

R.T.U Bill's intentions are noble to a select few, yet appears grossly malicious in nature to the silent majority.
What if the R.T.U sub-committee are also the same members of parliament, who have been investigated for their participation in the post coup events? Keeping in mind that the trial for the 2000 coup planners and executioners, is yet to be undertaken. It would be a great injustice, a slap in the face of the law abiding, honest and hard working people of Fiji to have this R.T.U Bill supersede existing jurisprudence.

Home Affairs C.E.O, Lesi Korovalavala has taken upon himself to spearpoint any media criticisms of this Bill, by conveniently labeling it as sensationalism.

Judging from the C.E.O's narrow definition, he would even label the vitriolic attack of the visiting Princess Anne as sensationalism. As well as the Fiji's national netball team's win over South Africa recently.

The words of the Korovalavala is also an indication that the gaunlet has been dropped against detractors. S.i.F.M is always delighted to pick it up, on behalf of the silent majority, the common people of Fiji.

Here is the reworded inscription of the statue of liberty, that sums up S.i.F.M's general philosophy.

"Give me [the issues of] your tired, your poor,
Your [concerns of intolerance, for the]huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The [tears of injustice from the]wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these [reports of abuse and degradation], the homeless, tempest-tossed to me.
I lift my lamp[of knowledge] beside the golden door [of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness]."

Click here for live cam of the Statue of Liberty.

Club Em Designs

Tribes Wanted-Dead or Alive.

Monasavu landowners after winning their Supreme Court case against Fiji Electriity Authority for the use of their ancestral lands.


The much touted TRIBES WANTED project has embarked on a media blitz to fluff up their mediocre business model. This was a much needed reaction(on their part) to repair their fragile profile, after being analysed negatively on the blogosphere.
Although the Jem report mentioned that the Tribes Wanted project is a LLC(Limited Liability Company)which technically isolates the owners from financial loses. It may be arguable that any legal tort filed for environment degradation or civil liability still has weight.

For an example if, someone is hurt during their stay and eventually dies; who should be taken to task. Is it the Vorovoro island chief or the Tribes Wanted project organizers?

Club Em Designs

Island Style-Footwear security.

My brother in law who resides in Sydney, Australia sent me this picture.

TRi-CIRCLE brand, a Chinese made padlock. For more security, "LOCKWOOD" brand (which is made in Australia) padlock is recommended.

Judging from the wear on those flip-flops and the heel impressions, this pair has definately been around the block. Could it be a lucky pair of flipflops?

As supply and demand equation goes, if that flip-flop was the last one on the planet-the price of this cost-effective footwear, astronomically increases.




Club Em Designs