Conscientious Objectors Use Veto Powers in U.N Security Council Vote.

In a stunning opposition to a U.S backed resolution that, basically had communicated a warning to Burma's military Government. In a nutshell, the U.N Security Council had to weigh the refurbishment of democratic principles conducted by Burma, against the greater evils existing in the world.

read more | digg story

Fijian Affairs Board Slush Fund Scrutinized.

Slush funds used by the Fijian Affairs Board (FAB) to issue unsecured loans for prominent individuals in Fiji, is covered by this Fiji Village article. It was understood that, these questionable loans were given subsequent to the naming of former Fiji P.M Laisenia Qarase, as chair to the Fijian Affairs Board. The former C.E.O for F.A.B, also declined to speculate on the existence of such a fund or its abuse.

read more | digg story

Fiji chiefs' about-face bolsters coup

FIJI'S Great Council of Chiefs has performed a remarkable turnaround to swing its support behind the regime of coup leader Frank Bainimarama.

read more | digg story

Australian Broadcasting Corporation interview with Peter Ridgeway .

Former Director Public Prosecutor of Fiji, Peter Ridgeway was interviewed by ABC on his looming prospects of returning to Fiji, to resume the coup investigations. Ridgeway, an Australia trained lawyer had his work permit revoked by the SDL Government, for his successful progress in investigating the details surrounding the 2000 Fiji coup.

read more | digg story

Chief No More.

Fiji born correspondent, Graham Davis contributor to the Australian, presents an interesting take on Fiji's changing fabric of society. Davis also reports on the increasing deficit in respect, for the Fiji aristocracy in the wake of the ebbing political tide.

read more | digg story

GCC's flip-flopping position.

In a convenient way to save face, the Great Council of Chiefs have now buckled and thrown their support behind the new interim Fiji Government; after the GCC chairman had refused to cooperate with the military council's prior requests.
Despite this new development, it certainly does not redeem the GCC's callous standing with the Fiji Army or hinder any proposals of overhauling the Native Lands Trust Board's charter and the surrounding native machinery.


read more | digg story

Pacific Postmodernism

Although, Fiji Daily Post editorial pivots on the question whether the ministerial line-up is really new or just a resemblance of historical political alliances, likewise, the Fiji Times' editorial, essentially portrayed a cautiously optimistic view; in either case, the new political appointees, represent a racially diverse group of individuals who are Fiji citizens first and foremost.

An example of this civic pride, is described by Fiji Times article on newly appointed interim Minister and former Parliamentary member of the Opposition, Bernadette Ganilau (pictured above), who also outlined her rationale of accepting the challenge; much to the disappointment of her former counterpart and deposed Leader of the Opposition, Mick Beddoes as published in a Fiji Time article.

To succeed, these fresh pick of players should be more concerned with seizing the moral high grounds by coalescing the hopes of all Fijian people, regardless of race, color or creed.

An imminent objective of this new ministerial line-up, is to reform, realign and refurbish many political partisanships that, an elite few have profited from, whilst the bottom feeders of Fiji society were held in economic servitude, to these conditions not of their interest or their choosing.

Despite these pressing concerns, it appears that some detractors from the NGO community as described the Fiji Times article, reflect a more lagging, self-interested desire to navel-gaze on legal posturing, engineered to diminish any forward momentum .

Fiji Sun article analyzes the eroding influence of Australia into the Pacific rim of fire. In itself the Pacific region may represent a foggy bottom for trivialities.

Is our Big Brother losing grip on the neighbourhood or Shackled by Pacific woes?

Some defence analysts believe that after a troubled year, Canberra's robust approach to regional affairs is beginning to unravel. Since 9/11 and the Bali bombings in October 2002 the Australians have pursued a more aggressive role in matters close to home. They worry that failing states could be exploited by terrorists or criminals. Despite the intervention of Australian troops and police officers as well as doses of heavyweight diplomacy, 2006 was a bad year for the South Pacific.

There was violence in East Timor, the Solomon Islands and Tonga. A military coup robbed Fiji of its elected government and tensions have persisted in parts of Papua New Guinea. "The crises of 2006 have reinforced the reasons why Australia is involved in the South Pacific, but they have undermined our confidence that we know what to do about it," said Hugh White, professor of Strategic Studies at the Australian National University.

"(Prime Minister) John Howard's always had a sense that there was a lot of trouble brewing in the immediate neighbourhood but I don't think they (the Australians) ever expected to find themselves as deeply engaged in as many places for such protracted periods of time," Professor White, a former government adviser, told the BBC.

In recent times Australia has sent hundreds of soldiers and police officers to the region's trouble spots in addition to deployments in Iraq and Afghanistan. Last November's mission to Tonga was short-lived but Australia is looking at an almost permanent presence in the Solomon Islands and East Timor. The appointment of Australian-born police chiefs in the Solomons and Fiji have ended in disaster with both men banished by disgruntled local officials. There are signs that resentment in the neighbourhood is mounting.

"Australian popularity is at an all-time low and its (regional) policies are being severely weakened," said Dr Steven Ratuva from the University of the South Pacific in Fiji.

The Howard government is accused of being too paternalistic. "Australia is more concerned with its own security in relation to terrorism and international crime to worry too much about the internal plight of the small island neighbours," cautioned Dr Ratuva. "The basic security issue in Fiji, the Solomon Islands, Tonga and East Timor is linked to internal political dynamics and economic development, not terrorism." Generally Australia's efforts to help its smaller regional cousins are welcomed.

But there is a feeling that Canberra should take more time to listen. A former member of the Solomon Islands parliament, Yukio Sato, said that a greater understanding of local problems was essential. "Australia must get off its high horse and properly look at these issues from the same vantage point as a Solomon Islander.

The root causes still lie in wait, as does a time bomb ticking away waiting to trigger yet another explosion," Mr Sato warned. The Solomon Islands capital Honiara was hit by violent disturbances last April. Years of ethnic fighting across the archipelago prompted Australia to lead an international rescue mission in 2003.

Important steps to recovery have been made but the road ahead promises to be rocky. The official view from Canberra is that Australia is committed to helping its island neighbours through difficult times and that aid and reconstruction efforts have been a success. The eradication of corruption and poverty remain key goals for the future. Analysts believe that Australia needs a keener appreciation of a diverse and volatile region if they are to be achieved.

"Australia hasn't yet found what else you send apart from the army to try and address those deeper political, social, economic problems that are the real root of the issue," said Prof Hugh White. Undoubtedly countries in the South Pacific need Australia's help but they want to be seen as equal partners and not basket cases.

Club Em Designs

Defying Land Sales Ban or Just Plain Ignorance?

The website for Fiji sales still advertise despite the declaration order of halting any land sales, was given by the military council recently.

read more | digg story

New Fiji government looks to Asia for new alliances

Article by IHT reflects on the comments by Fiji's new Minister of Foreign Affairs.

read more | digg story

Chaudary the deposed P.M, becomes Minister of Finance and Planning.

In a complete reversal of fortunes, Mahendra Chaudary is reported to have accepted the post
of Minister of Finance and Planning.

read more | digg story

Contingency Theory

Jonathan Edelstein has added another insightful post to his blog the Head Heeb. This posting reflects his opinions, dissecting the profiles of the new line of interim Minsters announced recently.

Fiji Times profile descriptions also provides images of the incubents.


Club Em Designs

Chronic Misfeasance

Opinion article by former Fiji resident and blogger whose article was published by Fiji Sun is a worthy read. The excerpt is as follows:

Coupists and wrangling lawyers By Victor Lal The Fiji Human Rights Commission director Dr Shaista Shameem's report against the deposed Laisenia Qarase government has drawn flak from some quarters of the legal fraternity. It has been described as "mostly laughable" by Suva lawyer Richard Naidu, who in an unwarranted broadside went on to suggest that "somewhere in her academic career, Ms Shameem apparently picked up a law degree. Her latest effort illustrates the dangers of allowing academic sociology types to study serious subjects like law". However, in the next breath he himself has been portrayed in the press as a leading expert on constitutional law. If I am not mistaken, both Dr Shameem and Mr Naidu are a cross breed between law and journalism, having worked as newspaper reporters before qualifying as lawyers. In Mr Naidu's case, he is a senior partner in Munro Leys specialising primarily in commercial and advisory work for clients in Fiji's aviation, energy, finance, sugar, media, telecommunications and tourism sectors. According to Munro Leys, he had recently been involved in advice and submissions to the deposed Laisena Qarase government on policy and regulation of both the tourism and telecommunications sectors. He was a member of the Government appointed Fiscal Review Committee appointed in 2004 to advise Government on tax and fiscal reform. In reply, Dr Shameem said Mr Naidu had a hidden agenda which would be revealed in due course. By whom, and when? Mr Naidu's legal partner Jon Apted, on the other hand, argues that the granting of immunity to the Interim Prime Minister Commodore Voreqe Bainimarama and his soldiers will arguably infringe on the human rights of others who want to sue them for wrongs they may have committed since the military takeover. One begins to wonder whether the lawyers in Fiji are truly committed to their vocations or are simply changing tune in different contexts and eras. Take, for example, Mr Apted, who had no legal reservations to act as the Supervisor of Elections in the 1992 and 1994 general elections, which was held under the blatantly racist 1990 Constitution, and which had basically disenfranchised half of Fiji's population - the Indo-Fijians following the racially motivated Rabuka coups of 1987. The positions of Prime Minister, President and armed forces commander were reserved for ethinc Fijians, as well as 50 per cent of civil service jobs for Fijians and Rotumans, and also 37 seats were reserved for Fijians in Parliament. The notorious affirmative action programme was also introduced into the 1990 Constitution. It was only recently that I condemned the hypocrisy practised by the president of the Fiji Law Society, Devanesh Sharma, in relation to the military lawyers, and challenged him to state why he had no qualm in defending the godfather of the coup culture, Sitiveni Rabuka, who was charged and found not guilty of inciting mutiny against the Commodore. Here again, one can ask Mr Apted to explain what is so repugnant about the proposed immunity planned by the President for Commodore Bainimarama and his soldiers, and yet Mr Apted saw nothing wrong in supervising two general elections which had returned Mr Rabuka as Prime Minister. Mr Rabuka had only become the Prime Minister because he had clothed himself under the sulu of immunity from prosecution for the crime of treason, which had carried the death penalty in 1987. Mr Apted, in reference to Commodore Bainimarama, now claims that "If you grant civil immunity for the men and women of the RFMF and you deprive somebody of the right to sue them for something wrong that they might have done, arguably you are infringing on that person's human rights" "Even if somebody made a law granting immunity, the immunity that has been promised is criminal and civil immunity prevents a person, whose rights have been breached, from suing in a court for damages", he said. In 1987, it was the former Governor-General Ratu Sir Penaia Ganilau, who after becoming the post-coup President, and supported by the GCC, had granted Mr Rabuka and his co-coup conspirators and others immunity from prosecution for executing not one but two coups, and hence shielding them from prosecution for the violence, brutality, and torture that was inflicted largely on the Indo-Fijian community. Although I disagree with some aspects of the FHRC report, it ought to be read, as Reverend Akuila Yabaki has urged us, with open mind. It was only a decade ago, in 1997 when Justice Daniel Fatiaki (later CJ) had ruled that Mr Apted, as Supervisor of Elections, had misdirected himself in law when he (Mr Apted) had refused to entertain a request from Dr Wadan Narsey that the latter be registered on the voter roll to enable him (Dr Narsey) to contest the Suva City Indian communal seat on an NFP ticket which had become vacant by the death of lawyer Harilal Patel. Dr Narsey had erroneously thought that he was already registered previosuly, and that registration continued until the death of the individual. Mr Apted had refused to use his discretionary powers to entertain Dr Narsey's application for late registration (The State v The Supervisor of Elections, ex parte Wadan Narsey, 1997). Moreover, Mr Sharma now says his society is seeking an independent view of the move by the military to send the Chief Justice and Chief Magistrate on leave while an inquiry is held into the judiciary. Mr Sharma, who is also a member of the Judiciary Services Commission, said the appointment of the Chief Justice was made in consultation with the chairman of the Public Service Commission and the president of the Fiji Law Society. The society has also challenged the legality of the appointment of Commodore Bainimarama as interim prime minister. Mr Sharma said the Constitution stated that the Prime Minister must be a member of the House of Representatives and be a member of the controlling party in the House. He is talking about the rules and procedures that existed during peace times in a democracy which, according to the former Prime Minister Laisenia Qarase, is 'a foreign flower' on Fijian soil. We live under a State of Emergency and in abnormal circumstances, and the appointment of Commodore Bainimarama has been made by the President who not only fully supports the coup but claims that he would have himself executed a coup against the Qarase government if he was wearing the Commodore's military jacket and boot. Now the GCC has also endorsed the appointment. In any event, the former chairman of the PSC, Stuart Hugget, is away in Australia, claiming to have taken an extended family holiday. The CJ went on leave without any protest. As I have repeatedly pointed out, since the Commodore has executed a military coup, he has the sole authority to decide which parts of the Constitution is defunct, and which parts are intact. Whatever these wrangling lawyers do or say, they must remember that it was none other than Dr Shameem who initiated the now famous Chandrika Prasad case on which these lawyers are basing their legal positions. Where were her critics after the 2000 crisis? Why they did not themselves initiate a legal test case? Well, here is more legal food for thought. Since Fiji has been suspended by the Commonwealth, why is the Fiji Law Society not calling on the foreign judges, mostly Australian and New Zealand citizens, to vacate the bench? The archaic Commonwealth practice allows these judges to decide the consitutional fate of Fiji. How many Fijian judges are sitting on the Australian and New Zealand benches? Also the overseas lawyers' membership of the society needs to be re-considered. Those lawyers who are so offended by what has taken place can simply hang up their legal robes and close their law firms as a protest against the decision of the President and the GCC, who have now recognised the Commodore as Interim PM. What took place on December 5 cannot even be described as a coup. Mr Qarase and his cabinet ministers had simply abandoned their portfolios and ran away, creating a public necessity for the Commodore to step in and take executive authority of Fiji, which he partially handed over to President Ratu Josefa Iloilo on January 5. As to the clean-up campaign, the Commodore has emabrked on a path which the United States, Great Britain and Australia had undertaken when they illegally invaded Iraq in search of the perceived weapons of mass destruction which they claimed the executed dictator Saddam Hussein had in his possession. They had even set up an Interim Administration to run Iraq, with the American Paul Brenner as its governor. In our case, let us hope and pray that the Commodore will find weapons on mass corruption in Fiji. The Commodore must not hurry up, for the Coalition forces are still in Iraq after four years. He must not be deterred by the lawyers preaching the rule of law and constitutionalism to him. The rule of law seeks to ensure that the Government will not behave in an arbitrary, corrupt, or oppressive way. And yet when it comes to lawyers, they are immune from legal suit. The primary basis for justifying an immunity from negligence within the legal profession is to maintain the lawyer's duty to the court over the duty of the client. Is it time to abolish the lawyers' own immunity from suit. Machiavelli once wrote: "For the reformer has enemies in all those who profit by the old order." Maybe, it is time Commodore Frank Bainimarama sent one of his men to the offices of the Registrar of Companies to see which lawyer and which legal firm drew up the business deeds of the Fijian companies and shareholders who are now under investigation in his clean-up campaign. All governments are subject to overthrow - either at the ballot box or by the gun if they refuse to mend their ways or in our case tried to compromise the safety and security of the nation and her citizens for selfish political ends. The rule of law is largerly a procedural notion; it does not address substantive questions. The 1997 Constitution needs major re-structuring before Fiji reverts back to civilian rule. Democracy gives no government the right to do what it wants to do in the country. victor_lal@yahoo.co.uk

The objective white glove inspection of Native Lands Trust Board has been one of the issues that was long advocated by S.i.F.M and welcomes the decision by the interim Government to conduct an official inquiry and subsequent proposal to overhaul N.L.T.B's charter, operations and management of native land in Fiji, as reported by Fiji Sun news.

Landowners hail NLTB review

The decision by Army Commander Commodore Voreqe Bainimarama to restructure the Native Land Trust Board has been welcomed by the Viti Landowners Resources Association. Association interim president Ratu Osea Gavidi said the restructure of the NLTB, which is already guided by the Native Land Trust Act, needs to be reviewed.

"It can be reviewed either by a decree of the interim government or convening of the next parliament or amendments to the Native Land Trust Act could be entertained," said Ratu Osea. So far, he said, the administration of the NLTB has been too centralised. "There is only one national board and four offices that includes Suva, Nadi, Lautoka and Labasa," he said.

"They should decentralise it at the vanua level and the mataqali level where it should be administered from." He said the bulk of the land is in the rural areas and this is one reason why the landowners are falling back all the time. NLTB, he said, is an arm of the government.
"And it is about time government returns management and administration of the native lands to native people. Restructure means you've got to return administration and management to the owners who are the mataqali and the tokatoka"

Ratu Osea said the chairman of the NLTB is the minister of Fijian Affairs who is a political appointee and is not appointed by the landowners. Because of the lack of resources and education within the vanua, he said, it had been put to the government to govern it and "this is why we welcome the restructure". Additionally, the civil servants who administered the land are undervaluing the native land, he added.

"Millions of dollars are being exchanged with the sale of the freehold land," he said. Ratu Osea said the qoliqoli is another asset of the native people that is in the hands of the State. "We ask for the ownership, management and administration of our qoliqoli be returned to the native people and people who go against that are unjust," Ratu Osea said.

This review of Native Lands Trust Board also follows the Fiji Sun reports of the military projecting their power by seizing control and encasing the Gold Mine infrastructure in a security envelope.

The seizure may be an effort by the military to ascertain the reasons by the current mine owner of ceasing mining operations, subsequent to the Fiji coup. As well as pursuing the linkages between N.L.T.B and the Gold mine operations with respect to the royalties, outstanding taxes, export taxes and the justification of a reported tax free holiday that the mine had enjoyed as thoroughly documented by this Roman Grynberg led academic study-PDF.

Surprising enough, the threats of closure by the Mine owners is also featured in the report and has been described as, a well used form of political bargaining in Fiji.

Lead Us Not Into Temptation.

The Fiji Times Editorial of Saturday Jan 6^th 2007 titled “Civilian Rule” warrants a reply.

The choice of the opening sentence of this editorial: “The military has dropped another bombshell with the swearing in of Voreqe Bainimarama as interim Prime Minister.” These words speaks volumes, of the decision by Fiji Times to defer the news of President Iloilo's reinstatement, to a subordinate and subservient role in the second sentence. The editorial assumed that the Army Commander had “negated his intention to hand back power to legal authority.”

The cynical commentary of the military's intentions to normalize the operations of the machinery of government may have conveniently escaped the Fiji Times' observations. Including the hostile takeover of the most coveted offices in the civil service that had been rumored to be so inept that, the million dollar expenditure as documented in the Kunatuba-agricultural scam case was overlooked by career civil servants and other rudimentary oversighters; who either had no scant idea whatsoever or were neck deep involved, in determing how the lion's share of the Fiji Government's budget was to be being spent so lasciviously.

Fiji Times Editorial further claims that, “The military therefore misses a golden opportunity to hand back to a civilian government but also returning the country to constitutional rule.”

It is appreciative of the Fiji Times to have their own schedule of when and how changes in the military clean-up campaign within the Fiji Government should be orchestrated.

Unfortunately and undesirably theirs is not a schedule tailored to meet the military's strategic plans for the nation of Fiji. Rest assured the military has duly noted the Fiji Times' keen interest in political timekeeping and how the milestones of governance should be aligned. As such, the transparent intentions by the Fiji military to fast track legislation for Freedom of Information in government machinery demarcates the abilities of the Fiji Times and the military. Suffice to say, highlighting the inabilities of the Fiji Times to achieve anything in governance, worthy of mention or remembering by the average citizen. History remembers players with heart, not observers with profit induced agendas.

It is also indicative of the apparent absence of such media persuasion, when the SDL Government was holding the reins of power and proposed to pass the controversial Bills of R.T.U, Qoliqoli and Lands Tribunal respectively.

Why did Fiji Times avoid protesting the reports by voters of impropriety during the 2006 elections, using their same method of sensationalism used to defend the Media Broadcasting Bill? Their mulled silence is similar to Fiji Times' token reaction to the decision by the SDL Government to increase Value Added Taxes from 12% to 15%.

No marches, protests, sit-ins were evident in the aftermath of the 2000 coup in Fiji. Nor did we see a symbolic stand by the Methodist church, or from the current leader of the World Harvest Center church in Fiji, Pastor Suliasi Kurulo against the spate of religious intolerance seen in the numerous Hindu temple defilements in Fiji. Even though, Pastor Kurulo was tempted to speak on the political developments in Fiji, by labeling the re-instated President a puppet as reported by this Fiji Live article; this does not exclude Pastor Kurulo from ignoring, glossing over and de-emphasizing the rectitude absconded in the 1987 and 2000 coups.

Church shocked with President's support
Friday January 05, 2007

The Christian Mission Fellowship in Fiji has expressed shock at the President Ratu Josefa Iloilo's statement yesterday that he supported the overthrow of Laisenia Qarase's government.

CMF president Reverend Suliasi Kurulo said it is apparent that Ratu Josefa is a puppet of the military.

"The whole country is reeling from the shock of these unfortunate utterances. To hide behind the rational of culture is unacceptable.

"To say that he (Ratu Josefa) would have done exactly the same thing is a crying shame," Rev Kurulo said.

He said the contradictory statements from the President before and after the illegal takeover by the Commander, confirms that he is being used by the army.

"His statement has made a mockery of our culture, government and our beloved nation."

Ratu Iloilo yesterday said he backed the military takeover saying the RFMF acted in the interest of the nation and upheld the Constitution.

Fiji Times Editorial concludes with this stylistic flaw of beginning a sentence with the word “And”.

“And there is no other effective and acceptable way forward of achieving that than for the military to disappear from the scene and allow reputable and honest civilians to take this nation back to constitutional rule. Period (sic).”

If it wasn't for the disparity of the Fiji Times' editorials skewed intentions, one would have already concluded that, this was the prime objective of the Fiji Army. These particular nuances in understanding the Army's intentions, is at times clouded by externalities and other pressures that may affect the slant of the media piece and underscores the major difference between those who get paid to write and those who live to write on Fiji.

Club Em Designs

Fiji re-installs President.

The interim military council has reappointed as President and Vuda chief Ratu Josefa Iloilo in a ceremony held in Suva, Fiji.

read more | digg story

Countervailing Theory.

Amazing developments have occurred in the wake of the release of the vote-rigging video by the Fiji Military; whose spokesperson acknowledged in this podcast by Niu FM, the existence of other video footage. The surfacing of this particular incriminating video has set off cascading denials by SDL representatives, fueled by this media frenzy.

Australian news agency ABC's podcast covered this video revelation, as well as attempting to verify the video's substance and this ABC's online article portrayed Foster's involvement, as a redeeming effort to clear his name. Fiji Time article reports further that, Foster had asked the military to free him.

Attempts by Australian Foreign Minister, Alexander Downer to downplay the significance of these vote-rigging video allegations was covered by an ABC article and his comments are considered by S.i.F.M, as nothing more than predictable belligerence.

Other frenzied reaction was in the un-journalistic form of shooting the messenger, which was employed by Fiji Daily Post's Editorial of Wednesday January 3rd, 2007 and the Fiji Times editorial also revealed an undertone of muted frustration regarding the political clean-up . The following verbatim, is the excerpt of Fii Daily Post's editorial comments:

Our newest patriot: a conman-spy or just another political prostitute?
3-Jan-2007

IS the military wise in having an internationally reputed con-man as a part of their arsenal against the deposed SDL government? Is Peter Foster an asset to the ‘clean-up’ cause? What credibility does someone of his questionable reputation bring to our ‘national audit’?
When one thinks of ‘clean government’ one does not think of Peter Foster. When we think of reformation, or a fresh new start for the republic, we have to confess the chubby face of Fiji’s newest patriot does not come to mind.

When the commander first announced his clean-up, few could argue with his ambition of wanting to seize the high moral ground. Everyone, including the publisher of this newspaper, Mr Alan Hickling, wants corruption out of Fiji’s business loop.

That being the case, the subsequent appearance of Peter Foster – not as target but as cleaner or auditor - in the clean-up campaign has surprised many. With someone of his colourful reputation now at the centre of the national audit, the integrity of the whole operation would seem to be at risk. Peter Foster just does not accord with the values inherent in the military government’s praiseworthy campaign.

Moreover, what are we to make of Mr Foster claims to have Fiji ‘in his blood’? How did it get there – given his recent treatment at the rough-end of a boat propeller and by our courts?

Or is it that his newfound affection for Fiji has sprung conveniently through his preferential treatment at the hands of the military? Is it that his ‘evidence’ against the Qarase government has become a trigger for emotions for Fiji never before expressed by the alleged fraudster?

The military government has rightly thwarted any thought of foreign intervention by Australian troops, yet it seems happy to allow a one-man Australian con-force to impact on its anti-corruption policy.

We suggest the military would do well to rethink this strategy and to distance itself from the bodgie efforts of Peter Foster. He is a super-intelligent person capable of manipulating many - and of planting his shifting feet in both camps at once. No one should be fooled.

This stinging response by the Fiji Daily Post editorial, had conveniently misapplied the straw man fallacy, to undermine the character of Peter Foster eventhough, he had paid his debt to society in other cases of fraudalent activity. Do the labels of fraudster automatically write off any good intentions harboured by this man?

Undeniably the damage done by the video allegations was far -reaching than anyone would have predicted and may have also contributed to the Fiji Human Rights Commission Chairperson's recent bombshell in this Fiji Village article, by declaring the Laisenia Qarase's SDL Government as constitutionally illegal, in another Fiji Village news article.

The actual 32 page legal summation by Fiji Human Rights Commission has been made available by Fiji Village in a document in PDF format.

Fiji's Chief Justice and Chief Magistrate have been ordered to take paid leave; pending a full, unbridled clean-up within the judiciary, as this Fiji Sun article reports. News of this judicial 'in -house cleaning' was also reported on by ABC and Fiji Times.

An opinion article by Fiji born, New Zealand Human Rights advocate, who outlined a series of flagrant misappropriations that, were virtually allowed to grow unchallenged, spreading the cancer of corruption further into the massive behemoth called Government; until it became a cesspool of institutionalized cronies, protected by a code of silence.

The opinion by T.R. Singh was posted in a Fiji forum on Fiji Village, by a writer whose user name is Kaicolo. This is the excerpt:

Date: Tue, Jan 2, 2007, 13:47

How Fijian Provinces were betrayed and looted by the Fijian Initiative

Thakur Ranjit Singh, Auckland, New Zealand

People of Fiji had been told of corruption and questionable dealings by those who were considered the marshals, saviours and guardians of Fijian race. When Frank Bainimarama sacked the government and took charge, his reasoning, among others, was to save the Fijian race from unscrupulous and wanting leadership. My purpose here is to substantiate this through reporting on Senate proceedings of some 14 years ago.

When Adi Quini Bavadra was alive she tried her best to reveal the dealings in Fijian Holdings Limited (FHL) but people with power and influence won and this matter never saw the light of day. My lament had been that while Fiji has an abundance of copy journalists and copy feature writers, there is dearth of good, conscientious, bold and sincere investigative journalists. Perhaps somebody like that can pick the hints from here, and perhaps create an FHLgate.

However I will report on what took place in Fiji's Senate on 18 May, 1993. In the Senate sitting of 18 May, 1993 (pages 731 to 748), Senator Manu Korovulavula moved a motion for the Senate to call on Government to carry out an investigation into the method adopted by the Board of the Fijian Holdings Limited to allow limited liability companies to buy shares into the company (FHL) without the knowledge of 14 Provinces. Senator Korovulavula had stated that the motion was brought on a point of principle to reveal less than honest dealings of people in position of power, knowledge and trust.

The intention of the motion was to reveal odd and strange method known to a selected group of shareholders who took advantage of this to borrow funds from the Fiji Development Bank (FDB) or the National Bank of Fiji (NBF) in order to buy shares in FHL.

As example of this a whole Province has only $50,000 Class A shares while a family private company shares add up to $200,000, which is a scam in any language. It is obvious someone somewhere had not been honest and loyal to the Fijian people in not telling them the truth.

FHL was primarily created to be owned by the Provincial Councils, Fijian people and Fijian institutions, NOT the elite limited liability family companies. The Great Council of Chiefs, right from its inception was unanimous to see that FHL was to be owned by 14 Provinces, NLTB and FAB.

However the irony and shame is that according to 1992 annual report, 14 Provincial Councils and two Fijian institutions, Native Land Trust Board (NLTB) and Fijian Affairs Board (FAB) hold only 30 % of total shares while the elite Fijians with their family limited liability companies hold 70% of shares. This is a fraud on the common indigenous people who are supposed to be shareholders of FHL through their respective provinces!

People of Fiji need to be made aware of Fijian Initiative. This Fijian advisory body comprised of intellectuals, professionals, businessmen and senior executives in the private and public sector. The aim of this initiative is to pull these resources, convene regular meetings and seminars to enable it to come up with recommendations to develop and assist Fijians to better themselves in all aspects of life, more so in the field of trade and commerce.

Senator Manu Korovulavula reported to Senate that it was interesting to know that some of the senior members of the Fijian Initiative did not consider it appropriate to advise the 14 Provincial Councils that they could borrow three or four times more from FDB, the amount of shares which they already had in FHL.

All this while, these senior Fijian sons took secretive actions to line their own and family's pockets at the cost of Provincial Councils!

Senator Korovulavula revealed private shareholding of three provinces with which he was familiar. Please note that all figures, amounts and situations reported are as at 1993, and they may have changed now. In Kadavu Province, he spoke about 3 companies. The first, Kadavu Development Company, which is fully owned by people of Kadavu, owned only $50,000 shares.

The other, KJY Investment Limited, owned by Qarase's Cabinet Minister Konisi Yabaki and his family, owned $100,000 shares. The third, Taoi Investment Limited, owned $200,000 shares. Shareholding in this Company then belonged to Jesoni Vitusagavulu and Ulaiasi Taoi.

Vitusagavulu is former staff of FDB, former Air Pacific Executive, former Director of Fiji Trade and Investment Board and currently Fiji's High Commissioner to USA, appointed by deposed PM Qarase. Taoi is President of Indigenous Fijian Business Council. Previously Rodney Acraman also used to own shares which have since been bought by the remaining two shareholders.

The interesting issue here in that Konisi Yabaki was then the Chairman while Vitusagavulu was Secretary respectively of Kadavu Development Company. They went ahead, used their positions to build their own interests at the cost of Kadavu Province.

The next province is Lomaiviti, which had only $55,100 shares while KB Investment Limited and 5X Investment limited owned $100,000 each while Vensalisi Investment Limited had $80,000 shares.

KB Investment Limited, with $100, 000 shares is owned by Bakani family. The head of this family Kalivati Bakani is former executive of FDB, former Deputy General Manager of NBF, former Carpenters Executive and current CEO of NLTB. The purchase of shares was financed by NBF

5X Investment, with $100,000 shares, is owned by Lote Rabuku, Semesa Matanicake, Delai Sainikinaivalu, Penisoni Gauna and KB Investments. Note that acquisition of these shares was also financed by NBF. Vensalisi Investment Limited, with $80,000 shares, is owned by Isikeli Mataitoga and family. Isikeli then was Director of Public Prosecutions and is CEO of Foreign Affairs.

Interesting point to note is that in less than two months after registration of 5X Investment, this $1 per Share Company got $75,000 loan from NBF. Additionally, three months after KB Investment Limited was registered, Kalivati Bakani's wife got $107,000 loan from NBF where her husband was the then Deputy General Manager. Three months after Isikeli Mataitoga's family company was registered, he obtained $64,000 from FDB which was headed by Qarase.

Now we move to the Province of deposed Prime minister, Lau Provincial Council, which had only $50,100 shares. At same time, Stiks Investment Limited had $150,000, Q-Ten Investment Limited had $200,000 and Kepa Investment Limited had $100,000 worth of shares.

Stiks Investment Limited shares of $150,000 are fully owned by Weleilakeba family. Sitiveni Weleilakeba is the CEO of FHL and one time business partner of democracy activist Laisa Digitaki, together with whom, he tried to run Mobil Walu Bay Service Station which went into receivership and was then acquired by Carpenters Motors. The shares in Stiks had been financed by FDB.

Q-Ten Investment Limited held $200,000 shares, which is owned by Laisenia Qarase Family. One property CT 14743, Lot 2 was mortgaged twice to acquire finance for $112,400 and $353,217 respectively. Note that at the time, Laisenia Qarase was the Managing Director of FDB, the lender for share acquisition. At that time, Laisenia Qarase was also the financial advisor to the Fijian Affairs Board, but failed to advise them of this insider information of acquiring shares.

Kepa Investment Limited, with $100,000 shares, was wholly owned by Lakepa family, Satini and Milika, and financed by FDB. An interesting point is that one of the nine points of Deuba Accord was for government to make $20m interest free LOAN to FHL through Fijian Affairs Board, repayable over 20 years. What taxpayers of Fiji need to know is under whose authority this taxpayers' loan of $20m was converted to a gift for FHL.

Note that board members of FHL, with shares then included Laisenia Qarase, Sitiveni Weleilakeba and Josaia Mar, who has been removed as Chairman of FEA by [the Army] Commander. Also note that Laisenia Qarase was the interim Prime Minister when this shady and questionable deal took place.

What the Fijian race needs to ponder is that Qarase regime has been projecting Indo Fijians as the common enemy of the indigenous race. Is this really so? Indigenous Fijian people had placed their faith in the hands of these intellectuals, so called professionals and who were supposed to be guiding the Fijian race.

The FHL was the commercial vehicle through which the wellbeing of Fijian race was intended to be improved. The dependency of the wisdom of Great Council of Chiefs and the elders in the villagers was on the shoulders of the so called Fijian Initiative group. However these very same people tricked their own people while projection Indo Fijians as villains.

With friends like the Fijian Initiative, the indigenous race need no enemies at all. There is a saying that enemies who strike from front is miles better than friends who strike on the back. Fijian Provinces have been dealt commercially fatal blows on their backs by their trusted sons.

Perhaps those who are crying for Qarase regime to come back need to consider whether he is worthy of this honour. The Commander is right in trying to save the indigenous race from the enemy within, as there is no fear from those outside.

Those who were Senators in 1993, and were present in Senate, including past President Ratu Iloilo and Adi Litia Cakobau need to answer to the Fijian race why this call for investigation was wiped under the carpet. Other Great Council of Chiefs nominees in that Senate also need to answer to their people.

As part of Commander's cleanup, the whole saga at FHL needs to be reopened and relooked and the $20m of taxpayer funds should be repaid to the nation, and specifically reserved for rural development of each of the 14 Provinces and fat cats Fijians need to be trimmed down to size, so that the whole nation can be spared from ungrateful sons who projected others as enemies of the indigenous race.

And those racist politicians and their hangers-on who projected and put Indo Fijians as red herrings should be made to answer to the indigenous race of this betrayal and who their real enemies are!

This Voyage forum has another post of T. R. Singh, when he dressed down the New Zealand media. An article by Asia Media provides more insight to T.R.Singh's comments in a recent rally for Fiji democracy, held in Auckland, New Zealand post 2006 coup.

Niu FM podcast of 1987 coupster, Sitiveni Rabuka ultimately reflects such tags like parachute journalism attached by T.R.Singh, on the shoulders of New Zealand based correspondents who are assigned to cover Fiji in a story.

Club Em Designs

Video of Allegations to Vote-Rigging in Fiji Elections.

A video that points to culpability of SDL in rigging Fiji's May 2006 elections was released. The video was sourced by a stake-out operation carried out by the Fiji Army.

read more | digg story

The Essence of Time.

Happy New Year to the readers of S.i.F.M.

The dawn of another year is upon us and this transition brings a new tide of concerns. Domestically in Fiji, it is the process of formalizing an interim Government, as Fiji Times article reports.

Developments in Fiji and Tonga and the passage of time seemed to throw a spanner into the works of oversight, dutifully carried out by Australian and New Zealand. Both egalitarian guardians, will grudgingly come to terms with the gray areas, the misty shaded veils that inhabit the fringes of Pacific governance and one stark fact: A gross inability of these Trans-Tasman outposts, of understanding these happenings.

Is the change of the Pacific fabric of society, a dictation of their inadequate level of diplomacy? Or is it a question of how Trans-Tasman diplomacy, is being dictated to these island nations?

Letters to Fiji Daily Post's Editor reflects the cognitive dissonance of political attitudes in Fiji. This is the excerpt of an outstanding one:

Shameful NGOs
30-Jan-2007

Sir,

I WORK for an NGO vested with human rights in New Zealand and generally, as professional courtesy, we are not openly critical of each other.

However the situation in Fiji has gone beyond my tolerance limit. The hypocrisy and double standards coming out from outcries of Shamima Ali, Virisila Buadromo, Laisa Digitaki, Angie Heffernan and company are sickening at best and are a shame to all agencies that fund such NGO chameleons that change their colour to suit the situation.

I have no sympathy with the changing colours of NGOs who condone blatant, naked and institutionalised racism, yet are crying when a few stupid people get what they deserved when they fail to heed warnings and realise and appreciate the reality of the situation.
Where were these champions of human rights when Qarase regime blatantly practised racism against Fiji Indians? They obviously unashamedly mix around with and blaze the cocktail circuits and rubbed shoulders with those who were committing gross abuses of human rights under a charade and guise of democracy.

Dr Shaista Shameem of Fiji Human Rights Commission is correct in her actions and decisions, and I can say that as a director who also works for a human rights organisation in New Zealand.

Our cardinal, first and foremost responsibility is safety, preservation and protection of human life, and if life is lost because of folly of people, then no use protecting rights of dead people.

That is exactly what she was doing when she warned people to exercise caution with due regards to the prevailing situation, because of curtailed rights which is the reality of situation, given the circumstances. Military is in power now and despite rhetoric of legalities from Heffernan and Ali, Dr Shameem was being sensible, pragmatic and a realist in trying to stop stupid people from doing stupid heroics, which we view as grandstanding and reeking of hypocrisy, and could result in loss of lives in extreme cases.

Instead of calling Dr Shameem to resign, the activists with selective sense of activism should look at their own suitability for their respective positions where they are not prepared to act without fear or favour in all cases.

Same applies to the so called freedom fighters who failed to heed commonsense and tried to gain publicity by gazing up the barrel of guns. Under the circumstances they have themselves to blame for their fate, bruises and bruised egos.


Thakur Ranjit Singh,
Auckland,NZ

Governance is now becoming more of a looming problem for Australia's Prime Minister, whose fear of an 'Asian invasion' were reported by PACNEWS and described in this Fiji Times article.

Although Australia's spending on defense has certainly skyrocketed and more directed to U.S manufactured arms; these arms trades are subject to embarrassing questions of quality, now being raised by the Australian media.

The big ticket item in question, is the recent purchase of 24 Super Hornet aircraft .

This particular deal was scruntinized by an article written by Carlos Kopp and published by the Age Newspaper of Melbourne, Australia.

The article's author questioned the aircrafts ability when compared with far superior performing Russian made aircraft like the Sukoi Su-30MK used extensively by Australia's northern Asian neighbor's of China, Malaysia and Indonesia.

What outclasses the Su-30MK from Super Hornet F-18E/F is that, the former has thrust vector controls, which enable the aircraft to perform tighter rolls and pitches. That particular design is now featured in the newest U.S generation of fighter jets.

This million dollar rip-off, is perhaps a reflection of Australia's junior standing in the pecking order of geo-politics, wealth and influence. The cruel irony of U.S foreign policy, is their crude program of defense assistance to Australia. Realistically, a catalog of 'hand-me-downs' whilst, more technological advanced aircraft sales to the UK are given first priority.
The unfolding of facts and time would also hasten Australia's realization to this inconvenient truth and should take heed of former English P.M, Winston Churchill's quote on US foreign affairs: "America always does the right thing. After exhausting all other possibilities."

Club Em Designs

Lines and Limits.

The parameters of the National Audit in Fiji has received much attention and curiosity. Very little curiosity was satisfied, leaving more outstanding questions than answers with readers of this Fiji Times article.

It is understood that more answers to posing questions of corruption can be answered when the notorious fraudster, is willing to shed more light as described by this Fiji Times article into his acquaitances with certain SDL Ministers, as well as some insight into the 2006 Election rigging allegations.

Fiji Affairs Board former C.E.O is reported to have been taken for questioning by the Army, in this Fiji Times article. Perhaps an occasion for a friendly reminder, of her employment status within the machinery of Fiji Government.
Although, the Great Council of Chief's (GCC)Chairman had safely navigated themselves into a corner by his attempt to rescind the Military issued order of employment termination for the FAB CEO, using his authority as Chairperson; the GCC Chairman ignored a niggling fact that, the incumbent of FAB CEO is an employee of the state and not the GCC secretariat . This confusion of powers may underscore the polluted ideals along with contaminated interests, between those of the state and that of GCC.

This question of demarcation between the state and the GCC, represents a legal question that will be raised time and again, along with the relevance of aristocratic influence. Both questions could be solved using alternative models of Government. Those very ideas of alternatives, to the West Minister system of Governance was floated by Fiji Chamber of Commerce President as covered by this Fiji Times article. It is unclear whether the interim Government has even considered such maneuvers, however those alternative models may well be an option that, won't be taken off the table by the Fiji Military Council anytime soon.


Club Em Designs

The Bottom Line.

(Above: Image of Fiji Parliament, Veiuto)

Fiji Times reports that, the interim President and Army Commander forbids the Great Council of Chiefs from meeting, a decision that would further dent their aristocratic aspirations to the reins of power. The date for the interim Government's grand debut was also announced by Frank Bainimarama as described in this article by Radio NZ, as well as confirming the new development on GCC's future.

Although the Fiji Human Rights Commission has been in the cross-hairs of most armchair experts of "rights" as reported in this Fiji Village article, Fiji Times and magnified by Newswire; the Human Rights Commissioner Dr. Shaista Shameem responds sternly to their reprisals especially the concerns of Alice Heffernan, an activist with Pacific Centre for Public Integrity(PCPI) as reported by Radio NZ article with a quick rebuttal outlined in this article by Radio Fiji news.

Surprising enough, the amount of allegations committed by the SDL Government including their involvement with the Agricultural scam was conveniently omitted from the attention of PCPI, revealing a degree of infancy in their general experience of tracking corruption.

So much in fact that, PCPI's relative ability to ignore blantant actions relating to conflict of interest involving SDL Ministers or their prior involvement in the 2000 coup is brow raising.

Although, the Australian Government halted Fiji's role in the RAMSI programs as detailed by this article by Radio NZ, Australian Foreign Minister's reaction is described in this Radio NZ article to the recent sacking of Australian imported Police Chief to the Solomon Islands and the news represents a wonderful example of diplomatic karma. Further reminders of the growing climate of distrust and the rapid erosion of influence into the region by the Trans-Tasman nations.


Club Em Designs

Ipso Facto: Re-gifting Democratic Consent.

Geo-political perspectives driven by some certain Anglo-American conglomerates on international law, may be an issue which inextricably deflates their grip on the moral high ground.

Ethiopia's invasion of Somalia is such a case, which the Bush led U.S Government was quite quick to rally support for such an audacious infringment. An infringment similar to their own escapade in Iraq.

The apparent abuse of international conventions, all began to slide down the slippery slope of faulty intelligence prior to the 2003 invasion of Iraq and subsequently respect for international conventions began free-fall with the aid of U.S interpretations of the word 'imminent'. Such interpretations were the catalyst of the heightened global dislike for the unfulfilled objectives of WMDs. Invalid conclusions of that hunt for WMDs, intiated a suspicious contempt of those who profess to spread freedom and democracy.

Almost a year ago today in his second Inaugural Address, President Bush laid out a vision that now leads America into the world. "It is the policy of the United States," the President said, "to seek and support the growth of democratic movements and institutions in every nation and culture with the ultimate goal of ending tyranny in our world." To achieve this bold mission, America needs equally bold diplomacy, a diplomacy that not only reports about the world as it is, but seeks to change the world itself. I and others have called this mission "transformational diplomacy." And today I want to explain what it is in principle and how we are advancing it in practice.

This documentary trailer titled “In the Shadow of the Palms” accurately display such a billegerent use of force, under the guise of freedom.

Whilst the western powers denigrate the bloodless coup of Fiji, their appalling silence in decrying such wanton abuses of international law, like Ethiopian Army's invasion of Somalia is apparently deafening. The British assault of a Basra police station is smiled upon because they had reportedly freed tortured prisoners.

While the reports of American and British soldiers torturing prisoners of their own in this report by the Scotsman, has highlighted a serious moral dichotomy.

Although U.S State Department press release reiterated a condemnation of the overthrow of a democratic elected Government of Fiji, a Niu Fm podcast of a New Zealand based Human Rights activist, voicing his approval on the general clean-up in the affairs of Fiji Government was recorded at an Auckland rally on Fiji and provided an ethical counter-point.

In condemning such an overthrow, the U.S State Department canceled military assistance programs with Fiji's Army. Such is the deplorable U.S State Department's over-reaction, which has also revealed an embarassing diplomatic shift, using the Potomac two-step when Fiji is compared with the Palestinian context of similar military assistance.

News reports by the Times of London, confirms the U.S weapons supply to Palestinian group Fatah. This assistance had sent shock waves of dismay throughout the minds of regional observers. Objectors view the military support as a perceived bias for an entity other than the duly elected Palestinian Government; while proponents view this as strengthening the office of the President Mahmoud Abas in this NPR news piece and podcast.

The Palestinian elected Government is filled by members of the Hamas party- recognized by the U.S State Department as a terrorist organization.

It has been said that, one person's terrorist is another's freedom fighter. The recent of announcement of Israel resuming settlements in the West Bank, despite tedious brokered accords outlawing such construction, would be a such occassion to raise similar questions on terrorism and freedom fighting.

Despite Israel's provocating attempt to push the envelope of international terms and conditions, this was not a viable enough reason to register change with the US State Department, as reported by Yahoo news .

Indifference to international laws is not an effigy foreign to the U.S State Department. Failure is the poor orphan and success the rich son. Both success and failure have been demonstrated in Iraq by the U.S, sadly not in equal measures. As such, the political demagogues who supported the Iraq invasion have now embarrassingly flip-flopped in their positions and the question of how to get out of a quagmire is the 64 million question that, baffles most political experts.

Not all coups and Governments are judged the same in the eyes of America. Although U.S condemned the Fiji coup, it has not issued such a condemnation of the military takeover of Thailand and Pakistan.

Whilst Iran's objective of obtaining Nuclear Technology has been ridiculed by the International community, US nuclear deal with India upsets the natural law concept of 'equal carriage' and further underscores an application of double standards.

Although, Tranformational Dilomacy is a new direction which the Secretary of State had adopted in her speech in January 18^th 2006.

Tranformations in geo-politics that don't according to U.S play book have been discredited, alienated and riddiculed by the powerful media. While the blantant abuses of international law by the U.S is glorifed, highlighted and revelled. Thus revealing a position within the U.S Foreign Policy and the media's potrayal of it, as alarmingly absent of subjectivity, morality and logic.

Club Em Designs