Source:
Gulf News
Australia, New Zealand face awkward questions about cooperation
Published: 14:01 June 9, 2013
Canberra/Wellington: Unease over a
clandestine US data collection programme has rippled across the Pacific
to two of Washington’s major allies, Australia and New Zealand, raising
concerns about whether they have cooperated with secret electronic data
mining. Both Canberra and Wellington
share intelligence with the US, as well as Britain and Canada. But both
Pacific neighbours now face awkward questions about a US digital
surveillance programme that Washington says is aimed primarily at
foreigners.
In Australia, the
conservative opposition said it was “very troubled” by America’s
so-called PRISM programme, which newspaper reports say is a top-secret
authorisation for the US National Security Agency (NSA) to extract
personal data from the computers of major Internet firms.
The opposition, poised to win
September elections, said it was concerned that data stored by
Australians in the computer servers of US Internet giants like Facebook
and Google could be accessed by the NSA, echoing fears voiced in Europe
last week over the reach of US digital surveillance in the age of cloud
computing.
Australia’s influential
Greens party called on the government to clarify whether Canberra’s own
intelligence agencies had access to the NSA-gathered data, which
according to Britain’s Guardian newspaper included search history, emails, file transfers and live chats.
“We’ll examine carefully any
implications in what has emerged for the security and privacy of
Australians,” Australia’s Foreign Minister Bob Carr said in a television
interview on Sunday, when asked whether Canberra had cooperated with
Washington’s secret initiative. Both
countries are members of the so-called ‘five eyes’ collective of major
Western powers collecting and sharing signals intelligence, set up in
the post-war 1940s.
Gulf News
"
Both Canberra and Wellington share intelligence with the US, as well as Britain and Canada. But both Pacific neighbours now face awkward questions about a US digital surveillance programme that Washington says is aimed primarily at foreigners.
"
DOTCOM ACCUSATION
In New Zealand, Internet
file-sharing tycoon Kim Dotcom, who is fighting extradition to the US on
charges of online piracy, took to Twitter on Sunday to highlight what
he alleged was the role of NSA surveillance in his own case, and the
cooperation of New Zealand’s spy agency.
“The New Zealand GCSB spy
agency was used to spy on my family because all surveillance was
available to American agencies in real time,” he tweeted, referring to
the Government Communications and Security Bureau. “My case against the spy agency in New Zealand will show the degree of cooperation with the NSA.”
A New Zealand government spokeswoman declined to comment on Sunday when asked if the GCSB cooperated with the NSA programme.“We do not comment on
security and intelligence matters. New Zealand’s intelligence agencies
are subject to an oversight regime, which we are looking to strengthen
...”
A New Zealand watchdog in
September last year found that the GCSB had illegally spied on Dotcom,
founder of file-sharing site Megaupload, intercepting his personal
communications ahead of a raid on his home in early 2012 by New Zealand
police, who acted on a request from the US Federal Bureau of
Investigation. That raid was also ruled to have been invalid.
Australia’s spy and
law-enforcement agencies want telecoms firms and Internet service
providers to continuously collect and store personal data to boost
anti-terrorism and crime-fighting capabilities - a controversial
initiative that one government source said would be even more difficult
to push through now, after news of the secret US surveillance of
Internet firms.
The underpinning legislation
has been the subject of almost three years of heated closed-door
negotiations with companies most affected and last year was referred to a
parliamentary intelligence oversight committee after drawing “big
brother”-styled criticism from lawmakers and rights libertarians.
Australia’s government, in
developing the legislation, has drawn on similar laws used in Europe
since 2006, but where it has also run into legal difficulties in some EU
member countries like Germany, where it was judged unconstitutional.
“I’m not sure what the
legislative backing for events in the US has been. We have tried here to
do ours as transparently as possible, with all the headaches that
brings. This will make that worse,” a government source said, speaking
on condition of anonymity because of political sensitivities.
Club Em Designs